Update: After thinking about it I would be surprised if the Motorola MOCA adapters support VLAN's as that would be hard to do with a 4 port unmanaged switch attached to one (that and the fact they don't mention a feature like being VLAN enabled). Here is their least expensive (that I know of): If you are looking for an inexpensive managed switch TP-Link makes some. Then again, a managed switch would support IGMP Snooping. This is assuming the Uverse router supports VLAN's. Thus you would need at least one managed switch on the end where your set-top box is. The switch on the back of the SBM1400 appears to be a standard unmanaged switch. If it supports VLAN's, it does not have a built in managed switch and thus cannot separate out the VLAN's by switch port. Anyway after downloading the data sheets and manual I can't tell if it supports VLAN's or not. I'm looking for AP (or router) devices with latest WiFi 6 / 802.11ax and built-in MoCA as backhaul. Latency and throughput is fine but is just a mess in terms of cabling. Yes that is a MOCA adapter set and it looks like a pretty good deal. I currently have a working 2-node (HME5000) MoCA 2.5 as backhaul for two TP-Link C7 AP's. Will VLAN Tagging cause the switch in the SBM1400 to route IPTV traffic to the port the set top box is connected to only, or or will IPTV traffic be transmitted to all ports on the SBM1400 switch. I plan on using one Ethernet port on the SBM1400 to connect a printer and another port to connect a computer. I was planning to connect the single port SBM1100 to a port on the Uverse router and the Set Top Box to one port of the SBM1400. Does VLAN Tagging supports the same functionality as IGMP snooping to prevent IPTV flooding? I am also considering the Motorola SBM1100 and SBM1400 MoCA Adapters and wonder if the adapters also support VLAN Tagging. The question I have is if VLAN tagging is a standard MoCA feature or specific to the Actiontec MoCA adapter. The specification indicates the MoCA adapter supports VLAN Tagging. I was reading the specification on the Actiontech ECB2500C. I understand the frequency the Uverse routers, coaxial connection uses, will interfere with the cable signal provided by the HOA, on the other hand I was told the MoCA adapters will not. I would like to use MoCA to deliver the Uverse signal to one or more set top boxes through the existing COAX. I am moving to an apartment and plan to subscribe to Uverse, because the cable company will not provide competitive pricing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |